<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bylines (Part 2 of 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jsomers.net/blog/bylines-part-2-of-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jsomers.net/blog/bylines-part-2-of-2</link>
	<description>the jsomers.net blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 05:02:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://jsomers.net/blog/bylines-part-2-of-2/comment-page-1#comment-5703</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 20:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jsomers.net/blog/bylines-part-2-of-2#comment-5703</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Are you sure?  If I am going to enjoy a piece more because before reading I&#039;ve been told it&#039;s written by a famous author, then that information is imparting value to me (even if it isn&#039;t true!)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Accordingly, it would seem inappropriate to force anonymity on anything which is read for entertainment.  What you say makes great sense for things read for knowledge, however -- journal articles are not that different from stackexchange posts it would seem.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure?  If I am going to enjoy a piece more because before reading I&#8217;ve been told it&#8217;s written by a famous author, then that information is imparting value to me (even if it isn&#8217;t true!)</p>

<p>Accordingly, it would seem inappropriate to force anonymity on anything which is read for entertainment.  What you say makes great sense for things read for knowledge, however &#8212; journal articles are not that different from stackexchange posts it would seem.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

